The automobile plays an
important role in the transport system of India. With increase in population
and living standards, the vehicle population also increasing day by day. There
is steep increase in the number of two wheelers during the last few years. All
this are increasing exhaust pollution and particularly in metros as density of
these vehicles is very high. As we know, more the emission, more the amount of
fuel we have to burn in engine.
Fuel consumption is directly depends on working conditions of an
engine. Particularly for two wheelers, an extensive analysis of energy usage
and pollution shows alternative power systems are still a long way behind the
conventional ones. Moreover many bikers uses modification in their exhaust to
get so called exhaust tune and sporty look.
Here is the live example of it. He has converted his normal TVS
bike into dirt bike and exhaust has been modified to get sound like dirt bike.
I saw many FZs, FAZERs and other bikes with modified exhaust like R1. Then I
decided to observe the effects of this modification and I had performed one
experiment.
Engine does a process called scavenging in between completion of
exhaust stroke and starting of suction stroke. This process is for removing the
burned gases from the cylinder with the help of fresh charge.
The scavenging efficiency of engine is directly affected by
speed of the engine, exhaust valve opening, exhaust port dimensions, exhaust
pipe location and position, dimensions of catalytic converter, muffler design.
All these parameters finally affect the back pressure of exhaust. Back pressure
in the exhaust is required to remove the gases from exhaust pipe.
After completion of exhaust stroke, Pressure in the exhaust pipe
becomes more than the atmospheric pressure. Because of this, gases flow
automatically from pipe to the atmosphere with high velocity and produces tune that
we listen from exhaust.
Now to get the smooth (Nearly Laminar) flow of
exhaust gases, designer keep the value of back pressure within limit by
introducing slant in muffler (You can observe this slant in each bike above 125
cc), muffler design, path travel by gases etc. according to the capacity of
engine. Now at the time of modification, we are influencing following
parameters:
1.
First of all we are
increasing the total length of exhaust because of which the path travel by the
gases increases. Now as the gases have to move long way, velocity developed in
the pipe decreases by the time. As per the rule, velocity and pressure are
inversely proportional. So finally pressure will increase and flow gets
chocked. (Chocking means drop in velocity of exhaust gases drastically. It
doesn’t mean the zero velocity. If the velocity becomes zero then we can’t run
the engine anymore. But as we are introducing more and more gases in the pipe
after each stroke, the gases finally reaches to the opening of pipe. But the velocity
is too low then the required.)
2.
As we are increasing
the exhaust pipe length, we are introducing more bends in the exhaust pipe.
Each bend causes flow restriction and friction losses in the gas flow. This
leads to chocking of flow again.
3.
As this two major
factors result in chocking of flow, the next batch of burned gases coming out
from cylinder don’t find any way to move.
4.
Finally the scavenging
efficiency of engine reduces drastically and burned gases remain in the
cylinder. These burned gases got mix with the fresh charge and burnt again and
again. This process leads to generation of more emission.
Experimental Setup
So to check the above said effects of
modification, I performed an experiment. The figure indicated here illustrates
the HH PASSION just for outlining the set-up. In real experiment, I used other
bike. I increased the slant of exhaust pipe up to 90°.
Because this is the maximum
angle likely to be exerted at the time of modification. 3000 to 5000 RPM was
selected for the test because in usual driving practice this is the most common
operating range.
First, I measured the performance with original angle provided
by the company to get the standard data. The next step was to carry out the
performance test with various changed angles of exhaust opening. Changed
exhaust manifold angles would result as higher fuel consumption, low brake
thermal efficiency, and high exhaust emission. Below fig indicates my
prediction I made before test and also illustrates the changing angle of
exhaust.
Results
- The value of back pressure for 90° is approximately 3.2 times more than the standard value.
- Back pressure value increases 0.08 KPa with increase in manifold angle by 1°. This nature of back pressure is applicable up to 60°.
- After 60°, the increase in back pressure turns out to be 0.44 KPa with 1° rise in manifold angle.
- Fuel Consumption increases 7.93 gm/hr with increase in manifold angle by 1°.
- Thermal efficiency of engine decreases 0.17 % with increase in manifold angle by 1°.
- HC emission increases 2.60 ppm with increase in manifold angle by 1°.
-
CO emission increases 0.054 % with increase in manifold angle by 1°.So guys, here you have the results of modification done in exhaust. I did the modification only with opening angle of exhaust; many other factors are yet remaining to be examined. Many other factors also contribute to these effects.You can judge the results what if all the factors contribute together. This is what generally happens when we modify our exhaust with local dealers or garages. We blindly are increasing pollution and fuel consumption of our bikes. Many calculators are available on net for calculating correct required back pressure for your bike engine. You have to insert some technical specifications and it will provide you the correct back pressure.I personally suggest you not to modify your exhaust ever. Because it is optimum design provided by the manufacturer and designed by their best designers. Even then if you are so passionate about noisy bikes (there is vast difference in tune and noise), first you get the calculated back pressure and then get the correct dealer for correct exhaust.
